LONDON – The winners of this year’s Wimbledon singles’ titles will net a staggering one million pounds (1.54 million dollars) in prize money after the All-England Club announced a significant rise in the rewards on offer at the grass-court grand slam on Tuesday.
The credit-crunch defying figures mean reigning men’s champion Roger Federer and women’s holder Serena Williams will benefit from an increase of 150,000 pounds (231,145 dollars) on the winning purses in 2009 if they retain their crowns in south-west London.
The total prize money for the event has been increased by 1.175 million pounds (1.81 million dollars) to 13.725 million pounds (21.147 million dollars).
All England Club chairman Tim Phillips insisted the landmark million pound prize reflected the tournament’s desire to provide a fitting reward for the world’s best players.
“Wimbledon exists in a highly competitive global marketplace and it is the world’s best players who create and drive the interest,” Phillips said.
“It is important that we offer a level of prize money which is both appropriate to the prestige of the event and which gives the players full and fair reward.
“It shows that the championships are successful and it shows that we care about the players.”
The purse for the champions at Wimbledon has now doubled in the last 10 years and is just below the 1.6 million dollars awarded to the winners of the 2009 US Open.
The runners-up in the men’s and women’s events at Wimbledon, which runs from June 21 to July 4 this year, will bank 500,000 pounds (769,618 dollars), while the semi-finalists will take home 250,000 pounds (384,782 dollars).
Winning the men’s and women’s doubles events is worth 240,000 pounds (369,334 dollars) per pair, while even players in the singles who are knocked out in the first round will earn 11,250 pounds (17,312 dollars) for their unsuccessful day’s work.
But as well as keeping Wimbledon firmly established as the world’s premier tennis tournament, the decision to raise the prize money to unprecedented levels has also been influenced by the slump in the value of the pound.
Posts
